Print

Limited evidence for evaluating differences in marginal bone loss between conventional, early and immediate loading protocols for mandibular two-implant overdentures Critical Summary Prepared by: Paul Hunter DMD, MLIS 

A Critical Summary of:

Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols: a systematic literature review

Ma S, Payne AG, Payne AGT. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2010;23(2):117-26

Published Date: 4/26/2011

This summary is published in the Journal of the American Dental Association and can be accessed at :-
http://jada.ada.org/cgi/content/full/142/4/427

OVERVIEW

  • Systematic Review Conclusion:

    In the absence of convincing evidence, a conventional loading protocol remains the standard treatment for a patient with a mandibular complete overdenture supported by two implants.

  • Critical Summary Assessment:

    This systematic review, mainly covering a one- to two-year observation period, did not find or rule out major differences between loading protocols.

  • Evidence Quality Rating:

    Limited

Rate This Critical Summary






Information in the above "Rate the Critical Summary" box is used by the administrators of this Website to gauge the usefulness of Critical Summaries and make improvements to the program. If you have comments specific to this critical summary and would like to contact the editors, please  Send a Letter to the Editor

x

Letter to the Editor