Print

Complete regeneration of peri-implantitis–induced bony defects using guided bone regeneration is unpredictable Critical Summary Prepared by: Satheesh Elangovan BDS., ScD., DMSc 

A Critical Summary of:

Regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis using bone substitutes and membrane: a systematic review

Sahrmann, P., Attin, T., Schmidlin, P. R.. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research. 2011;13(1):46-57

Published Date: 7/7/2013

This summary is published in the Journal of the American Dental Association and can be accessed at :-
http://jada.ada.org/content/144/7/823.full

OVERVIEW

  • Systematic Review Conclusion:

    Complete fill of peri-implant bony defects using a guided bone regeneration (GBR) protocol does not seem to be a predictable outcome.

  • Critical Summary Assessment:

    On the basis of the low-quality evidence of this weak systematic review, GBR cannot be recommended over other methods for the treatment of peri-implantitis–induced bone loss.

  • Evidence Quality Rating:

    Poor

Rate This Critical Summary






Information in the above "Rate the Critical Summary" box is used by the administrators of this Website to gauge the usefulness of Critical Summaries and make improvements to the program. If you have comments specific to this critical summary and would like to contact the editors, please  Send a Letter to the Editor

x

Letter to the Editor