Skip to main content
Toggle Menu of ADA WebSites
ADA Websites
Partnerships and Commissions
Toggle Search Area
Toggle Menu
e-mail Print Share

Associated Topics

Ante’s law is not evidence based

Ben Balevi B.Eng, D.D.S., Dip EBHC(Oxford), M.Sc. .


Overview

Systematic Review Conclusion

The long-term prognosis of a fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) with abutments that have severely reduced periodontal support depends on the maintenance of a healthy periodontium.

Critical Summary Assessment

Although the results of this review are limited by the quantity and quality of included articles, there appears to be no scientific evidence requiring that in fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) design, “the total periodontal membrane area of the abutment teeth must equal or exceed that of the teeth to be replaced”1 (Ante’s law).

Evidence Quality Rating

Limited Evidence

This summary is published in the Journal of the American Dental Association and can be accessed at: http://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(14)61838-9/fulltext


Critical Summary Publication Date:

9/8/2012

These summaries are not intended to, and do not, express, imply, or summarize standards of care, but rather provide a concise reference for dentists to aid in understanding and applying evidence from the referenced systematic review in making clinically sound decisions as guided by their clinical judgment and by patient needs. American Dental Association © 2018